Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,995,684 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 87.0 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $37,965, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $91,293, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $82,254, a difference of 0.59%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $49,201, a difference of 0.89%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $47,916, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.2%), single father poverty (18.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.1%), male disability (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%).