Canadian vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,677,501 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 105.3 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $55,415, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($87,769 compared to $85,797, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $39,109, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $61,270, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $44,987, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.39%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.3%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.6%).