Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Icelanders

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Icelander Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,017,050 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 110.2 Icelanders.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Icelander Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $44,987, a difference of 48.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $104,282, a difference of 44.5%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $55,415, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,247, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,109, a difference of 17.8%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 24.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$44,987
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Good
$104,282
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Good
$85,797
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Good
$46,916
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Good
$55,415
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Fair
$39,109
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$51,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$95,560
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Good
$102,261
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,270
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 147.9%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 144.3%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 44.2%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 103.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 97.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 30.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Average
82.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.1%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 68.2%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 61.9%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
48.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 81.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Icelander Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamIcelander
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%