Chippewa vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,673,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.299% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 298.6 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,987, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,261, a difference of 21.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,797, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,247, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,109, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 94.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.48%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).