Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,293,758 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 20.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $95,560, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $39,109, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,969 compared to $46,916, a difference of 0.11%), householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $61,270, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.3%), family poverty (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.3%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.95%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.45%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.8%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.19%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.7%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.94%).