Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,081,771 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $64,989, a difference of 17.3%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $108,251, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $103,736, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $53,818, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $96,824, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 49.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.1%), single female poverty (22.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.3%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 146.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 20.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.46%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.7%).