Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,628,983 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 34.3%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $56,243, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $96,824, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $43,243, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,818, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $64,989, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.26%), family households (66.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%).