Uruguayan vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,330,618 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 62.3 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $43,243, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $64,989, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $53,818, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $96,824, a difference of 3.4%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $56,243, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.9%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.8%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.1%).