Bhutanese vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,696,119 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 19.4 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,736, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $96,824, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $43,243, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($52,297 compared to $49,572, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,818, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and college, under 1 year (70.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.27%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.62%).