Malaysian vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Ethiopians
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,687,180 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.282% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 282.4 Ethiopians.
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $46,569, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $43,243, a difference of 15.9%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $53,818, a difference of 4.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $96,824, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $103,736, a difference of 9.8%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Malaysian vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |