Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,121,295 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $45,014, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $55,571, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($51,770 compared to $51,731, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $107,148, a difference of 0.24%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $62,516, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.83%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.36%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.2%).