Immigrants from China vs Cambodian Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,893,512 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212 and weighted average of $69,174. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,372,212 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390 and weighted average of $66,892, a difference of 3.4%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Cambodian
Minimum	$18,324	$13,250
Maximum	$178,333	$123,750
Range	$160,009	$110,500
Mean	$74,620	$63,009
Median	$76,354	$66,420
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$64,801	$44,945
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$82,502	$76,799
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$17,701	$31,853
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$24,782	$26,681
Standard Deviation (Population)	$24,614	$26,261

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Cambodians by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Australia ($69,164, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($69,343, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Northern Europe ($69,003, a difference of 0.25%), Afghan ($68,951, a difference of 0.32%), and Asian ($68,822, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Australian ($66,891, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan ($67,007, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa ($67,234, a difference of 0.51%), Latvian ($67,326, a difference of 0.65%), and New Zealander ($67,333, a difference of 0.66%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional $69,343
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional $69,174
Immigrants \| Australia	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional $69,164
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional $69,003
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $68,951
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $68,822
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $68,801
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $68,495
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $68,235
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $68,208
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $68,037
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $67,926
Russians	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $67,626
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $67,594
Koreans	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $67,472
New Zealanders	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $67,333
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $67,326
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $67,234
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $67,007
Cambodians	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $66,892
Australians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $66,891