Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,459,882 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 25.3 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $51,731, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $107,148, a difference of 30.3%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $62,516, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $66,892, a difference of 14.6%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $55,571, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.0%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.24%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.84%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%).