Chinese vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,065,836 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 22.7 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,892, a difference of 15.8%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,731, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,516, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.21%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $117,780, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,342, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.4%), family households (68.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.9%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%).