Chippewa vs Cambodian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Cambodian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Cambodians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cambodian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,970,841 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Cambodians.
Chippewa vs Cambodian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $51,731, a difference of 41.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $96,324, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $114,342, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,571, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $66,892, a difference of 24.2%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $51,731 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $117,780 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $96,324 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $53,386 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $62,516 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $45,014 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $55,571 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $107,148 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $114,342 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $66,892 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Average 25.8% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 62.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 54.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.4%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 67.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 81.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Good 37.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 59.8%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 26.7% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 75.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 72.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 47.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chippewa vs Cambodian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Cambodian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |