Pima vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,383,899 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,662, a difference of 49.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $104,566, a difference of 42.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,398, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,219, a difference of 0.56%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,718, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,336, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 101.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 98.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 38.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 109.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 95.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 76.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 80.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 76.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 69.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%).