Hmong vs Arab Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Arab
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Arabs
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arab Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,618,476 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.695% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 695.0 Arabs.

Hmong vs Arab Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,662, a difference of 19.8%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $57,298, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $104,566, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,219, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $62,266, a difference of 10.5%).

| Income Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $45,662 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Excellent $106,952 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Excellent $88,398 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $48,599 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Exceptional $57,298 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Excellent $40,718 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $51,219 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Excellent $97,336 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Excellent $104,566 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Good $62,266 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Poor 26.6% |
Hmong vs Arab Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and female poverty (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

| Poverty Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Fair 12.7% |
| Families | Average 9.1% | Fair 9.2% |
| Males | Poor 11.6% | Poor 11.6% |
| Females | Fair 13.9% | Fair 13.7% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Poor 20.5% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Good 13.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Fair 16.6% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Fair 16.8% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Fair 16.8% |
| Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 13.0% |
| Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Poor 16.6% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Good 29.0% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 10.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Average 12.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Good 11.5% |
Hmong vs Arab Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

| Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.3% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Poor 11.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Average 4.7% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Poor 4.6% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Average 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.6% |
Hmong vs Arab Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

| Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Good 65.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 79.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Good 36.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Poor 74.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Poor 82.4% |
Hmong vs Arab Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.68%).

| Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Fair 64.1% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Excellent 6.0% |
| Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Good 47.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Hmong vs Arab Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

| Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Average 10.5% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Average 89.6% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 55.0% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 18.9% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Poor 6.0% |
Hmong vs Arab Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

| Education Level Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Fair 97.9% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Fair 97.9% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Fair 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Fair 97.8% |
| 3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Fair 97.7% |
| 4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 96.2% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Good 95.9% |
| 9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Good 95.1% |
| 10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Excellent 94.0% |
| 11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Excellent 92.9% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
| High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
| GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Excellent 86.6% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 67.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 61.6% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 40.9% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hmong vs Arab Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

| Disability Metric | Hmong | Arab |
| Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Males | Tragic 12.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
| Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Good 6.5% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 22.8% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Good 47.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Excellent 2.1% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Average 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Average 17.3% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Good 2.4% |