Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,000,682 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $57,114, a difference of 24.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $91,385, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $78,682, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,028, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $43,998, a difference of 2.3%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $39,827, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households (68.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.4%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.6%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.34%).