Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,885,442 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $52,121, a difference of 36.3%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $80,357, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $94,138, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,573, a difference of 0.29%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,812, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $53,503, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 50.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (68.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 92.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%).