Native Hawaiian vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,194,855 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.1%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $54,163, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $90,266, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,846, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $51,236, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $42,406, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 59.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 239.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 140.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 24.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 98.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 64.1%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.99%).