Native Hawaiian vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,021,859 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,232, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $86,764, a difference of 21.2%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $74,847, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $35,930, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $41,474, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $37,699, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 79.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 64.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (68.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 73.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 79.7%), ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 4.5%).