Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,770,911 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $48,126, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,543, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $64,433, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $89,263, a difference of 0.74%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $106,285, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $98,122, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.9%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.56%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and family households (68.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.36%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.6%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 51.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.23%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.3%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%).