Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,035,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $50,914, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $61,422, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $51,555, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $93,602, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $111,454, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 71.1%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.3%).