Native Hawaiian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,928,146 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 58.6 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,093, a difference of 16.3%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $47,248, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $49,113, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $102,777, a difference of 2.3%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $107,502, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $86,635, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.0%), family households (68.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.06, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 69.7%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%).