Native Hawaiian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,423,412 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $52,074, a difference of 27.0%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $62,857, a difference of 20.2%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $52,294, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $66,891, a difference of 6.2%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $96,490, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.2%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.5%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.7%).