Native Hawaiian vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,013,420 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $47,698, a difference of 16.3%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $58,588, a difference of 12.0%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $90,446, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $107,870, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $40,491, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.13, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.95%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.60%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%).