Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,781,109 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.889. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 29.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $56,975, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $96,086, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $82,560, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $52,860, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,945, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,682, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 41.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.6%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 45.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.9%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.74%), college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.3%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.1%).