Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,163,491 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $48,747, a difference of 18.9%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $62,292, a difference of 14.0%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $59,278, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,919 compared to $91,015, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $107,378, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $53,990, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.8%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 76.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.53%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%).