Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,040,358 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $54,030, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $91,462, a difference of 15.0%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,017 compared to $41,195, a difference of 0.43%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.48%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $44,462, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.9%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 209.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 121.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 86.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 94.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%).