Native Hawaiian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,418,665 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 6.9 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $57,975, a difference of 22.5%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $82,810, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,436, a difference of 0.060%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $93,694, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $46,026, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.37%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.43 compared to 3.07, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households (68.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.28%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%).