Native Hawaiian vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,404,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 17.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,621, a difference of 15.2%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $44,076, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $95,511, a difference of 0.48%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $104,396, a difference of 0.49%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $37,904, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.1%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.6%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.15, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.93%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.8%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.15%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.54%).