Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,514,605 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $46,187, a difference of 19.4%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,008, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $63,355, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $105,249, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $95,450, a difference of 0.41%), and median family income ($104,910 compared to $108,544, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 41.5%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and family households (68.4% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.7%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.1%).