Native Hawaiian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,599,868 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,465, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,700, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $56,837, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $104,408, a difference of 0.71%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $88,934, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,335, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.18, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.87%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 74.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 34.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.0%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%).