Native Hawaiian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,429,265 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $58,244, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $94,517, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $81,064, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $43,844, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $50,772, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.9%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (68.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.50%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.4%).