Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,372,875 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $63,014, a difference of 12.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $100,535, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $43,229, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $55,562, a difference of 0.73%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $106,417, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.17%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.38, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 110.5%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.17%), college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%).