Native Hawaiian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,857,000 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 12.9 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 31.6%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $55,327, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $91,357, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,017 compared to $41,655, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $51,446, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,820, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 57.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.43 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 208.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 120.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 83.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 64.1%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), associate's degree (43.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%).