Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Native Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Native Hawaiians

Celtics

Average
Average
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,237,372 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Celtics.
Native Hawaiian Integration in Celtic Communities

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $60,608, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $50,447, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $83,193, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,283, a difference of 0.46%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,732, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $92,241, a difference of 3.0%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Income
Income MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,017
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Good
$104,910
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,919
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,027
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,306
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,461
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,158
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,058
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,149
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,021
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.9%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Good
8.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.8%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.11, a difference of 10.2%), and family households (68.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
68.4%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.43
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Poor
33.3%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.1%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.1%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.3%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Native Hawaiian vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricNative HawaiianCeltic
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%