Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Native Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Native Hawaiians

Soviet Union

Average
Good
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,562,428 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 25.9 Soviet Union.
Native Hawaiian Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $54,202, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $63,382, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $46,556, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $55,340, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and median household income ($89,919 compared to $95,098, a difference of 5.8%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,017
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Good
$104,910
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,919
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,027
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,306
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,461
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,158
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,058
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,149
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,021
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Exceptional
24.2%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.1%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
83.0%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.0%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
68.4%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.43
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
26.3%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 126.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 112.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 75.9%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
4.4%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 72.6%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 67.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.1%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.5%

Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Native Hawaiian vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricNative HawaiianSoviet Union
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%