Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,907,191 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $55,394, a difference of 28.2%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $92,208, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,714, a difference of 0.81%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,532, a difference of 1.1%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $51,642, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 56.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.3%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.5%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 234.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 140.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 58.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 99.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.7%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 57.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.0%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.1%).