Native Hawaiian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,152,999 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $49,862, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $60,117, a difference of 14.9%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $50,399, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,154, a difference of 1.8%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $93,960, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $110,103, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.33%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.83%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.3%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 48.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.6%).