Liberian vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,760,818 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $89,856, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $52,631, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,356 compared to $55,327, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,929 compared to $91,357, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($91,722 compared to $94,466, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (40.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (42.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 98.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.5%), master's degree (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.70%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%).