Immigrants from Yemen vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,745,234 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Immigrant from Yemen communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Yemen within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.159% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Yemen corresponds to a decrease of 159.3 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,696 compared to $41,655, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($65,194 compared to $80,402, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,043 compared to $89,856, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.9%), median earnings ($39,540 compared to $45,820, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($47,527 compared to $55,327, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 105.4%), family poverty (17.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 59.6%), and male poverty (20.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father poverty (20.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (16.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 68.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 15.2%), family households with children (29.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.32, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (63.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (42.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 22.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (80.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and bachelor's degree (29.9% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (95.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (95.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (95.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.6%), disability age under 5 (0.91% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), female disability (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.6%).