Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,889,076 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.459% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 459.4 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.9%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $37,904, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,621, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,731, a difference of 0.030%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,071, a difference of 0.62%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $104,396, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.0%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.67%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%).