Nonimmigrants vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,578,438 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $103,071, a difference of 9.1%), and median family income ($96,231 compared to $104,396, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $37,904, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $51,493, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($44,117 compared to $46,315, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.6%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.2%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%).