Immigrants from Asia vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,555,780 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $85,681, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $37,904, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $95,511, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,493, a difference of 9.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $61,621, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.0%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.8%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.3%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%).