Immigrants from Central America vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,454,627 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 32.3 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $44,114, a difference of 26.1%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $101,856, a difference of 19.8%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $54,492, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $53,939, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $59,854, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (68.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 33.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 63.5%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 56.5%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%).