Immigrants from Philippines vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,016,116 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 43.0 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $59,854, a difference of 10.5%), median household income ($93,899 compared to $86,824, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $95,362, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,000 compared to $44,114, a difference of 0.26%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $54,492, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.3%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%).