Pima vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,721,918 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,114, a difference of 44.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $100,837, a difference of 37.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $86,824, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,939, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,698, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,362, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 102.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 51.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 80.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 62.1%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 68.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 67.8%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 73.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%).