Immigrants from China vs South American Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
South American
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
South Americans
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs South American Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,269,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | South American |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 14.8% |
Range | 18.9% | 13.6% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (5.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |