Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,454,883 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $33,921, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $67,792, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $77,089, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $52,509, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $35,063, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 77.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 34.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 136.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 88.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.3%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 0.78%), college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.9%).